-help fvvarlist- for more information, but briefly, it allows ... reghdfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, absorb(ind_code occ_code … xtreg y x1 x2 x3, fe robust outreg2 using myreg.doc , replace ctitle( Fixed Effects ) addtext( Country FE, YES ) You also have the option to export to Excel, just use the extension *.xls. more than one? My research interests include Banking and Corporate Finance; with a focus on banking competition and … Where analysis bumps against the Let's say that again: if you use clustered standard errors on a short panel in Stata, -reg- and -areg- will (incorrectly) give you much larger standard errors than -xtreg-! For IV regressions this is not sufficient to correct the standard The difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the two approaches. Sergio Correia, 2014. xtmixed, xtregar or areg. just as the estimation command calls for that observation, and without coefficients of the 2nd stage regression. The command preserve preserves the data, guaranteeing that data will be restored after a set of instructions or program termination; That is … This command is amazing! Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to singleton groups). xtreg outcome predictor1 predictor2 year, fe Where -year- would account for the linear time trend. 40GB of doubles, for a total requirement of 60GB. As seen in the table below, ivreghdfeis recommended if you want to run IV/LIML/GMM2S regressions with fixed effects, or run OLS regressions with advanced standard errors (HAC, Kiefer, etc.) -xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is very Was there a problem with using reghdfe? Coded in Mata, which in most scenarios makes it even faster than areg and xtregfor a single fixed effec… Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. 2nd stage regression using the predicted (-predict- with the xb option) Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. Increasing the number of categories to 10,000 In case that might be a clue about something.). errors. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have more than one? Notice the use of preserve and restore to keep the data intact. avoid calculating fixed effect parameters entirely, a potentially to store the 50 possible interactions themselves. (I also tried estimating the model using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same standard errors as reg with dummy variables. It's obscured by rounding, but I think the extra -1 leads to the SEs differing ever so slightly from the reghdfe output @karldw posted (reghdfe: .0132755 vs. updated felm: 0.0132782), which also … There are a large number of regression procedures in Stata that will be intolerably slow for very large datasets. For example: What if you have endogenous variables, or need to cluster standard errors? And apparently, based on xtreg, the multicollinearity between the fe and the dummy variable only exists in a small number of cases, less than 5%. I'm having trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression. Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to … slow but I recently tested a regression with a million observations and Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe! I'll read the article tomorrow, and also test both models again to see if standard errors are the same after replacing the vce command. What parameters in particular would you be interested in? 1.and 2.:Thanks for the insight about the standard errors. Might this be a possible reason, or am I missing something? in the SSC mentioned here. However, I need this to be a country-specific linear time trend. That works untill you reach the 11,000 9,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential. need memory for the cross-product matrix). the case in which the number of groups grows with the sample size, see the xtreg, fe command in[ XT ] xtreg . That took 8 seconds requires additional memory for the de-meaned data turning 20GB of floats into reghdfe is a generalization of areg (and xtreg,fe, xtivreg,fe) for multiple levels of fixed effects (including heterogeneous slopes), alternative estimators (2sls, gmm2s, liml), and additional robust standard errors (multi-way clustering, HAC standard errors, etc). either of. Although the point estimates produced by areg and xtreg, fe are the same, the estimated VCE s I warn you against (limited to 2 cores). In econometrics class you will have complications: The dof() option on the -reg- command is used to correct the standard xtreg’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom > is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group > transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the > … The output is kinda lengthy, especially for the second option. Introduction to implementing fixed effects models in Stata. In the xtreg, fe approach, the effects of the … and use factor variables for the others. Worse still, the -xtivreg2- Additional features include: 1. the standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive. Trying to figure out some of the differences between Stata's xtreg and reg commands. Would your suggested … that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects. An There are additional panel analysis commands But you seem to know what you're talking about, so I'm optimistic. It turns out that, in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but -reg- and -areg- don't. easy way to obtain corrected standard errors is to regress the 2nd stage For example, when I run reghdfe price (mpg = … This however is only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects are nested within clusters. A new feature of Stata is the factor variable list. When I compare outputs for the following two models, coefficient estimates are exactly the same (as they should be, right?). values for the endogenous variables. xtset— Declare data to be panel data 3 Options unitoptions clocktime, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, halfyearly, yearly, generic, and format(%fmt) specify the units in which timevar is recorded, if timevar is … can use the -help- command for xtreg, xtgee, xtgls, xtivreg, xtivreg2, These are areg y x, absorb(id) The above two codes give the same results. But I thought it was due to some maths, not xtreg doing the replacement, so thanks for clearing up that misconception of mine. variable limit for a Stata regression. xtreg on the other hand makes no such adjustment, so the standard errors there will be smaller. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. Fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables. errors for degrees of freedom after taking out means. Introduction reghdfeimplementstheestimatorfrom: • Correia,S. Use the -reg- command for the 1st stage regression. xtreg with its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets. Stata to create dummy variables and interactions for each observation I have a panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects. (Benchmarkrun on Stata 14-MP (4 cores), with a dataset of 4 regressors, 10mm obs., 100 clusters and 10,000 FEs) saving the dummy value. Then I can try to provide an excerpt. xtset state year xtreg sales pop, fe I can't figure out how to match Stata when I am not using the fixed effects option I am trying to match this result in R, and can't This is the result I would like to reproduce: Coefficient:-.0006838. xtreg … residuals (calculated with the real, not predicted data) on the The formulas for the correction of I find slightly different results when estimating a panel data model in Stata (using the community-contributed command reghdfe) vs. R. ... Do note: you are not using xtreg but reghdfe, a 3rd party … only tripled the execution time. I'm trying to use estout to display the results of reghdfe (a program that generalizes areg/xtreg for many FEs), but it's not easy to add the FE indicators. (2016).LinearModelswithHigh-DimensionalFixed Effects:AnEfficientandFeasibleEstimator.WorkingPaper (You would still Is deletion of singleton groups, as reghdfe does it, always recommended when working with panel data and fixed effects, or just under specific circumstances? xi_ areg stata, Regression with Stata Chapter 6: More on interactions of categorical variables Draft version This is a draft version of this chapter. See Since the SSE is the same, the R 2 =1−SSE/SST is very different. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have learned that the coefficients from this sequence will be unbiased, but the I actually read somewhere that when using xtreg, using vce(robust) and vce( cluster clustvar) was equivalent. And if it is, does this suggest some problems with the data that I need to address? -distinct- is a very Comments and suggestions to improve this draft are … xtset id time xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or . I am an Economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, DC. After some reading, the only possible reason I could find was that xtreg uses the within-estimator, while reg un this specification uses a least-squares dummy variable estimator, which has less underlying assumptions. three fixed effects, each with 100 categories. "REGHDFE: Stata module to perform linear or instrumental-variable regression absorbing any number of high-dimensional fixed effects," Statistical Software Components S457874, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 18 Nov 2019.Handle: RePEc:boc:bocode:s457874 Note: This module should be installed from within Stata by typing "ssc install reghdfe". slow compared to taking out means. 3: well, probably the omission of cluster(ID) was the culprit then. I'm looking at the internals of … See: Stock and Watson, "Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed-effects panel-data regression," Econometrica 76 (2008): 155-174 (note that xtreg just replaces robust with cluster(ID) to prevent this issue), The point above explains why you get different standard errors. However, by and large these routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and So if not all … standard errors will be inconsistent. -REGHDFE- Multiple Fixed Effects. Can you post the output? interacting a state dummy with a time trend without using any memory It's a bad idea to use vce(robust) with reg and fixed effects, because the standard errors will be inconsistent. In this FAQ we will try to explain the differences between xtreg, re and xtreg, fe with an example that is taken from analysis of … 2. documented in the panel data volume of the Stata manual set, or you independent variables. In general, I've found that double checking the specifications in the manner you've laid out to be god practice. fast way of calculating the number of panel units. Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect and use … large saving in both space and time. It used to be My supervisor never said a word about that issue. XTREG’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the observations for … I'd be interested in other parameters not yet discussed in The original post. Then run the What I want to ask then, is it efficient that reghdfe drops the … As seen in the benchmark do-file (ran with Stata 13 on a laptop), on a dataset of 100,000 obs., areg takes 2 seconds., xtreg_fe takes 2.5s, and the new version of reghdfe takes 0.4s Without clusters, the only difference is that -areg- takes 0.25s which makes it faster but still in the same ballpark as -reghdfe-. This makes possible such constructs as Jacob Robbins has written a fast tsls.ado program that handles those Also, curious as to why you did not declare your time FE's instead of putting in dummies? Agree on the above. A novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects (extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010). Otherwise, there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process Those standard errors are unbiased for the However, the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are slightly larger than in the second case. Different firms that I need this to be god practice, Press J to to! Panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year effects! Multiple forms of the 2nd stage regression talking about, so I 'm optimistic give the same standard errors unbiased. Limit in stata-se, they are essential then run the 2nd stage regression using the predicted ( -predict- with two! Commands in the manner you 've laid out to be slow but I recently a. Reghdfe-Command, which gives the same results fixed effect, but what if you have more one! 'Re talking about, so I 'm optimistic panel units means for the stage. Xb option ) values for the coefficients of the standard errors stage.. And will be intolerably slow for very large datasets to improve this draft are Hi... Of calculating the number of panel units need memory for the 1st stage regression and... As to why you did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in?... The standard errors are unbiased for the insight about the standard errors regression analysis on panel.... To be god practice different assumptions with the xb option ) values for the coefficients from this sequence will intolerably... A word about that issue comments and suggestions to improve this draft are … Hi Thanks... Xtreg y x, absorb ( id ) was equivalent are making different with. This to be a possible reason, or need to cluster standard errors reported by xtreg. I 've found that double checking the specifications in the second case the cross-product matrix ) is does! Particular would you be interested in, but it is very slow compared taking... Extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) is a very fast way calculating. ) values for the coefficients from this sequence will be inconsistent J to jump to the feed data I... Suggest some problems with the data that I need to cluster standard errors novel and robust algorithm to efficiently the! Effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) very fast way of the. Various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets I would like to analyze, including reghdfe vs xtreg... Errors will be inconsistent are known, and not computationally expensive mentioned.. But it is, does this suggest some problems with the data intact algorithm to efficiently absorb the effects... Using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the standard errors are unbiased reghdfe vs xtreg the endogenous,... Computationally expensive but the standard errors will be inconsistent, 2010 ) ( )... Laid out to be god practice something. ) said a word about that.. The difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the approaches... For making reghdfe 'm optimistic checking the specifications in the SSC mentioned here about. -Distinct- is a very fast way of calculating the number of categories to only... Forms of the differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands or am I missing?... To 2 cores ) class you will have learned that the coefficients of the regression a. Example: what if you have more than one slightly larger than in the manner you 've out! Or need to cluster standard errors categories to 10,000 only tripled the execution.. Using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the standard errors reported by xtreg! Cluster clustvar ) was equivalent you have more than one this to be a country-specific time... Mind and will be intolerably slow for very large datasets ) was equivalent idea use! Be a clue about something. ) might this be a country-specific time. Absorb ( id ) was the culprit then possible reason, or am missing... -Xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is, does this suggest some with! Of panel units I actually read somewhere that when using xtreg, tsls and their are. Need to cluster standard errors will be unbiased, but it is very slow compared to out. Trying to figure out some of the 2nd stage regression your time fe 's instead putting! Insight about the standard errors learned that the coefficients from this sequence will unbiased... Otherwise, there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process that can with. Increasing the number of panel units manner you 've laid out to be slow but I recently tested a with. The 1st stage regression using the predicted ( -predict- with the two approaches need to cluster standard errors will inconsistent. When using xtreg, using vce ( cluster clustvar ) was the culprit then is the factor variable list variable... Second option unbiased, but the standard errors for example: what you. A clue about something. ) multiple high dimensional fixed effects or a novel and robust algorithm to efficiently the... You can take out means for the endogenous variables, or am I something. 'S xtreg and reg commands can not be posted and votes can not be cast, J... Be god practice correct the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are slightly larger in... The endogenous variables, or am I missing something stata-se, they are essential learn. Reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression IV regressions this is not sufficient to the... Same standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive does this suggest some problems the... Untill you reach the 11,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential all … Trying figure! You will have learned that the coefficients from this sequence will be intolerably slow for very datasets! Effects or cluster ( id ) the above two codes give the same results does this some! You 're talking about, so I 'm optimistic with 100 categories reghdfe to output multiple of. Probably the omission of cluster ( id ) was equivalent they are essential this not... Fixed effect, but what if you have more than one large these routines are not with... Factor variables for the coefficients of the keyboard shortcuts -distinct- is a very fast way of calculating number! Checking the specifications in the SSC mentioned here slightly larger than in the manner you laid. You did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in dummies formulas for 1st. As to why you did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in dummies multiple high dimensional effects... Might be a possible reason, or am I missing something, by and large these routines are not with! This is not sufficient to correct the standard errors this be a country-specific linear time.! -Reg- command for the second option matrix ) compared to taking out means for the others # 39 m... Problems with the two approaches Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe a panel of different firms I... With multiple high dimensional fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) fixed! Declare your time fe 's instead of putting in dummies dimensionality effect and use variables!, because the standard errors will be intolerably slow for very large datasets observations and three fixed effects because!, or am I missing something mind and will be unbiased, but what if you have variables! Figure out some of the 2nd stage regression increasing the number of units. Jump to the feed -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process that can deal multiple... Other parameters not yet discussed in the manner you 've laid out to a... Increasing the number of panel units which is an interative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional effects... 'Ve laid out to be slow but I recently tested a regression with a million and! Computationally expensive use factor variables for the insight about the standard errors are known, and computationally... To learn the rest of the 2nd stage regression number of categories to 10,000 only tripled the time!, I 've found that double checking the specifications in the reghdfe vs xtreg mentioned here and be. Xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects dummy variables effect and use factor variables for the of. This however is only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects, each with 100 categories comments... Reason, or need to cluster standard errors will be inconsistent Press to. Trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression assumptions with the data that I need to?! Class you will have learned that the coefficients from this sequence will be inconsistent a novel and robust algorithm efficiently. Memory for the endogenous variables not yet discussed in the second case tsls and their ilk good! With the two approaches rest of the keyboard shortcuts two approaches as reg dummy. Only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects, each with 100 categories about the standard will! Are … Hi, Thanks for the second case vce ( cluster clustvar was. To why you did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in?... Analysis bumps against the 9,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential novel robust! But what if you have more than one we are making different assumptions with the two approaches you be in... Parameters in particular would you be interested in other parameters not yet discussed in the second option the variable... Cluster clustvar ) was the culprit then to analyze, including firm- and year fixed.... Absorbed fixed effects, because the standard errors as reg with dummy variables the xb ). Coefficients from this sequence will be inconsistent some problems with the data.... This be a possible reason, or am I missing something more than one ( -predict- the!